• Hackathon Radar
Hackathons
  • Browse
  • Judge Opportunities
  • Sponsors
  • Organizers
  • Map
  • Discover
Explore
  • Stats
  • State of Hackathons
  • Changelog
Personal
  • Passport
  • Favorites
  • Settings

Join39 Agent Hackathon

lumaHosted on Luma

Fetched 5 months ago

Friday, February 20, 2026

to Friday, February 20, 2026

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningOpen SourceInnovation

Event Type

in person

44

Participants

3

Est. Projects

We are hosting a Join39 hackathon at MIT for builders who want to create agent apps, agent infrastructure, and real experiences. Join39 lets anyone create their own AI agent, then build on top of it. That can mean product experiences, developer tools, integrations, workflows, or new infrastructure that makes agents more useful and more trustworthy. Agent frameworks are having a moment right now and OpenClaw is going viral. This hackathon channels that momentum into building concrete things on top of Join39. How it works: you build during the hackathon window, then in a few weeks we host a demo competition and award the best app, tool, or experience built on Join39 agents. If you build software and you are curious about agents, come join.

Judge Accessibility

Organizer email available25/25
Student-run event15/15
Actively looking for judges25/25
Small event (120 participants)10/10
No corporate sponsors10/10
New or emerging organizer10/10
Public registration available5/5
Online format (judge from anywhere)10/10

Top signals

Organizer email available
Student-run event
Actively looking for judges

Organizers

Alex Johnson

alex@example.org

Jamie Rivera

jamie@example.org

Sam Chen

sam@example.org

Estimated Audience

Mostly Students
ExperienceStudent
OccupationStudents
Beginner Friendly
Women in Tech

Technical Focus

AI95%
Web80%
Mobile25%

Industries

Healthcare
Education
Climate

Technologies

Python
React
OpenAI

Why this estimate

  • • Hosted by a university
  • • Open to students
  • • MLH member event

Estimate inferred from event metadata, not actual attendee data.

Quality Score

Quality Score

72/100
High confidence
Organiser16/20
Event Maturity14/20
Sponsors18/25
Participants12/20
Operations12/15

Why this score

Strong organiser track record
Returning event
Well-sponsored

Missing data

Prize details
Code of conduct